Clinton v. W. Bush: Whose Lie Was Worse?

So whose lie was worse? Clinton not having "sexual relations with that woman," or, W. telling us that the only people being investigated with the "illegal" searches were terror suspects and not many more as it has turned out to be.
I think you all know how I feel. Saving our country from terrorists versus tearing at the heart of our country's moral fabric on the most public of stages? No contest. But the liberal media in this country thinks it is. So let me know what YOU think.

John McCain: Did he have it coming to him?

I know that there was all of this controversy in 2000 when George W. Bush used some negative campaigning to help him defeat John McCain in the Republican primary. But my question is, did he deserve it? Are we better off for this having happened? I for one know how I feel about it (I love the Bush family), but what about you? Only lovers of this great country of ours need reply.

Introduction

This is a blog designed to jumpstart George H.W. Bush's (George Sr.) bid for the presidency for 2008. People are quick to forget that George Sr. still has another term of office available to him if this country's "citizens" are smart enough to reelect him. The Bush/Bush ticket (no rules in the constitution stopping George W. from being VP. Take that Democrats.) would allow George W. to reclaim the Whitehouse in the unfortunate event that George H.W. Bush were to pass away. Also, this would give the Bush's four more years to erase the term limit rules from the constitution so that George W. could run again in 2012. Its interesting that the Democrats were all for more than two terms when FDR was in office, but now would oppose it. I bet they would have been okay with it were slick Willie still in office.